The Awards Selection Process

How are award winners selected?

The Mental Health Service Awards is a peer reviewed process, based on information supplied in the written entry. Each entry is evaluated against the published criteria for that Award category. For a TheMHS Award to be granted, an entry must satisfy each of the stated criteria.

TheMHS Learning Network reserves the right to make changes to the number of awards in each category. There is a possibility that no award is granted for a category. The Judges’ decision is final.

Non-Award Level Recognition

In addition to the Award winners, judges may wish to award a Highly Commended recognition to acknowledge quality aspects of an entry and encourage further development.

The Judging Panels

TheMHS Awards Judging Panels are convened for each category of the Awards. Each panel is comprised of five judges, who cover a broad spectrum of mental health disciplines across Australia and New Zealand. These can include mental health consumers and carers, academics, researchers, psychiatrists, program managers, and health workers.

The Media Awards Judging Panels are comprised of a mix of communication and media professionals, and mental health experts.

The respective panels review all Award submissions and decide on the Award winners in collaboration with the Awards Manager.

Award Judges 2020

Alexandra Keller

Bianca Lapins

Carrie Miller

Elizabeth Paton

Julia Hennessy

Kevin Kellehear

Lynne Malcolm

Sharon Lawn

Noel Muller

Andrea Taylor

Brendan O’Hanlon

Cassy Nunan

Fiona Orr

Julie Millard

Liz Newton

Mark Smith

Peter McGeorge

Tim Heffernan

Ann White

Carol Churchill

Catharine Campbell

Joe Calleja

Kat  Bhathena

Lyndal Sherwin

Mironne Golan

Roger Gurr

Valencia Taljaard

Barbara Tooth

Carolyn Ngan

Douglas Holmes

John Farhall

Keith Sutton

Lynne Dunbar

Nicola Newton

Shane Fenwick

Warwick Smith

The Judging Process

Judges score each entry according to the criteria as stated on the website (for specific criteria please see the webpage for the relevant category). These criteria need to be addressed in the full description section (“Part B”) of each entry.

To help control for inter-rater variability, those entries receiving first and second places for each judge are taken into account. Judges meet to confer on each Award category and to decide who will receive Awards or Highly Commended recognition.

Entrants are asked to nominate 2 referees as part of the submission process.  Referees may be contacted to provide further clarification regarding content of an entry.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN THE JUDGING PROCESS

If a conflict of interest arises where a judge or other person concerned with the Awards Program finds that he or she has been involved in the development or implementation of  an Award program or service, the judge notifies the Awards Manager. He or she will not be involved in marking the relevant entry and will absent themselves from any discussions regarding that entry.

To learn more about the TheMHS 2021 Awards, click here.