The Least Restrictive Alternative – Is It Too Restrictive?

Go back to Resource Library
By May 25, 2015 No Comments

Authors: Judy Clisby and Marilyn Starr, NT

Year: 2007

Event: 2007 TheMHS Conference

Subject: HUMAN RIGHTS AND ETHICS, Choice and Risk

Type of resource: Conference Presentations and Papers

ISBN: 9780975765333

Abstract: The principle of ‘the Least Restrictive Alternative’ forms the basis of the 1991 UN Principles for the Protection of People with Mental Illness and for the Improvement of Mental Health Care, and underpins mental health policy, legislation and practice in Australia today. Yet there are varying understandings and interpretations of what is meant by the term ‘least restrictive’. It will be shown that differences in understandings can lead to mental health practice that is more restrictive, even though mental health policy makers and practitioners may be committed to practice in accordance with ‘the Least Restrictive Alternative’. Using current literature and case exemplars, this paper challenges current interpretations of what is meant by ‘the Least Restrictive Alternative’. It explores alternative ideas and conceptions to assist in understanding the complexities inherent in the provision of a service that is truly the ‘least restrictive’.

This resource is only available for subscribers. If you have a subscription, please log in. Otherwise, click here to purchase a subscription.